Reach Us +44 1752 712024
mental health, psychiatry and mental health, journals on mental health, mental health journals, journals mental health
journals for mental health, best journals for mental health, mental health journals uk, journals on psychiatry
journals of psychiatry, psychiatry journals, asean, journal
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 4829

ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry received 4829 citations as per google scholar report

ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry peer review process verified at publons
Journal Name ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry (MyCite Report)  
Total Publications 456
Total Citations 4829
Total Non-self Citations 12
Yearly Impact Factor 0.93
5-Year Impact Factor 1.44
Immediacy Index 0.1
Cited Half-life 2.7
H-index 29
Social Sciences Medical & Health Sciences
Q3 Q2
  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Behavioural Science
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Community Psychiatry
  • Dementia
  • Community Psychiatry
  • Suicidal Behavior
  • Social Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry Diseases
  • Psycho Trauma
  • Posttraumatic Stress
  • Psychiatric Symptoms
  • Psychiatric Treatment
  • Neurocognative Disorders (NCDs)
  • Depression
  • Mental Illness
  • Neurological disorder
  • Neurology
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Parkinson's disease

Research Article - ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry (2021)


Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author:

Fazlollah Keshavarzi, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Email:

Received: 14-Sep-2021 Published: 19-Oct-2021


Objectives: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of Malaysian university and pre-university students, especially after the shift to online academic activities, following almost one year of experiencing the pandemic Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among Malaysian pre-university and university students, nationwide, using perceived stress scale-10 questionnaire and another validated 11-construct questionnaire. Key findings: The online questionnaires were filled out by 383 Malaysian pre-university and university students. About 40% of the respondents reported moderate to severe level of loneliness and social isolation. There was a significant correlation between suicidal thoughts and the social isolation. The prevalence of moderate to severe suicidal thoughts (14% of the respondents) was more than the reported prevalence before COVID-19 pandemic. The residential state, gender and ethnicity of the respondents did not show an association with depressive and suicidal thoughts of the respondents. Conclusion: Loneliness and feeling social isolation were the most prevalent problems, as reported by the students. Suicidal Thoughts are more prevalent, compared to pre-COVID-19 reports. The educators and institution managers must seek for appropriate methods to address the critical condition.


COVID-19, Mental Health, Suicidal Ideation, Social Isolation


The negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of public [1] and university students [2] has been reported by several recent publications. The devastating economic effects of the pandemic, especially in developing countries [3], as well as the social restrictions due to the preventive measures have increased the feelings of insecurity, fear, anxiety and loneliness. 

Starting from March 2020, the Malaysian government, in line with the Movement Control Order (MCO) has ordered the education sector to switch all academic activities into online-based learning. This policy has been effective with variations in the intensity of avoidance from face-to-face activities till present [4].

While tertiary education institutions put tremendous efforts to tailor the teaching and assessment processes to the online education requirements, they must pay enough attention to the mental situation of the learners, at the same time. This is not a natural, technology-based movement, but a compulsory move, driven by a disastrous situation that affects the students in many ways. This study aims to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic, especially after the shift to online academic activities, among Malaysian university and pre-university students, following almost one year of experiencing this situation.


Study design

The level of perceived stress was evaluated, quantitatively by using the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS) [5] which is a widely used questionnaire. The focus of the instrument is on exploring the perceived stress during the past month. The second component of the survey is the assessment of mental health status of pre-university or university students by asking the participants to rate the severity of impacts to them during COVID-19 pandemic on 11 constructs. These constructs had been utilised by researchers before the pandemic [6,7], as well as during the COVID-19 crisis [8]. The constructs include the health impact of the pandemic to the students or their families, difficulty in concentration, sleep patterns, eating patterns, social relations, academic performance, living environment differences, financial problems, class workload, and any depressive and suicidal thoughts. A 4-point scale determines the severity of the impact; from 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), to 3 (severe).


All active Malaysian students of nationwide universities and colleges were eligible for participating in this study. The recruitment was through online platforms and social media during March and April 2021. The closure of campuses did not allow any form of face-to-face data collection. However, the shift of academic activities toward online platforms enhanced the online data collection processes.


The study proposal was approved by the Faculty Research and Scholarly Activities (FRSA), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University. Ethics approval was not required due to the non-interventional and non-sensitive nature of the survey. However, ethical concerns were reviewed and evaluated by FRSA. A Google Form consisted of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS) and the 11-construct questionnaire was disseminated among potential respondents. Upon agreeing with the written consent from, the participants were asked to fill in the demographic data section, before they proceed to the designed questionnaire. The participants were assured confidentiality of collected personal data.

Data analysis

The IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22 was used for the descriptive analysis of the demographic data and the research findings, as well as the inferential analysis of covariates, associations, and regressions.



The number of students who responded the online questionnaire was 385, but two were excluded due to their non-Malaysian nationality. The 383 eligible students were coming from 51 academic institutions. There were more female respondents than male students (217 versus 166). Only seven respondents were married. The detailed demographic data frequencies are summarised in Table 1. The SPSS dataset is available on Zenodo repository [9].

Table 1. Demographic data of the participants

Variables Participants (N=383)
Gender, n (%)  
Male 166 (43.3)
Female 217 (56.7)
Academic Year, n (%)  
Pre-University 27 (7)
Degree-Junior 118 (30.8)
Degree-Senior 200 (52.2)
Postgraduate 38 (9.9)
Ethnicity, n (%)  
Malay 102 (26.6)
Chinese 195 (50.9)
Indian 86 (22.5)
Residential state, n (%)  
Melaka 27 (7)
Kuala Lumpur 102 (26.6)
Negeri Sembilan 13 (3.4)
Sarawak 39 (10.2)
Selangor 70 (18.3)
Perak 16 (4.2)
Johor 23 (6.0)
Pahang 17 (4.4)
Sabah 11 (2.9)
Terengganu 12 (3.1)
Perlis 8 (2.1)
Kelantan 12 (3.1)
Kedah 18 (4.7)
Pulau Pinang 15 (3.9)

Challenges to college students’ mental health during COVID-19. The overall PSS score, based on 383 responses, was 17.99 which is moderate perceived stress Table 2. An increased level of anxiety due to the COVID-19 pandemic was reported by 353 (91.68%) of the participants. Figure 1 shows the distribution of mental health aspects among the respondents.

Table 2. Overall Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS) score

PSSa items Score, Mean (SD)
In the past month, how often have you felt upset because of something that happened unexpectedly? 1.85 (1.129)
In the past month, how often have you felt that you were unable to control the important things in your life? 1.73 (1.145)
In the past month, how often have you felt nervous and “stressed”? 2.05 (1.123)
In the past month, how often have you dealt successfully with irritating life hassles? 1.81 (0.925)
In the past month, how often have you felt that you were effectively coping with important changes that were occurring in your life? 1.78 (0.997)
In the past month, how often have you felt confident about your ability to handle your personal problems? 1.83 (1.051)
In the past month, how often have you felt that things were going your way? 1.63 (1.035)
In the past month, how often have you found that you could not cope with all the things that you needed to do? 1.81 (1.039)
In the past month, how often have you been able to control irritations in your life? 1.62 (1.109)
In the past month, how often have you felt that you were on top of things? 1.88 (1.075)
Overall PSS scores 17.99 (4.1)

Figure 1. The distribution of mental health features among the respondents

About 67% of the students were suffering from depressive thoughts to some extent. Among those with depressive thoughts, 27 (almost 7% of whole respondents) are severe cases. The crosstab analysis shows the 12 students with severe suicidal thoughts are coming from the same 27 students. Nevertheless, there were 43 (11%) students with moderate suicidal thought. None of the gender, residential state, race, and academic level shows a significant association with suicidal and depressive thoughts in uni-variate factorial ANOVA analysis.

Nearly, three quarter of the respondents indicated that the academic workload had been increased to some extent by moving from face-to-face learning to online mode of learning. There is a significant association between the perception if increased academic workload with depressive thoughts (p<0.001) and suicidal thoughts (P<0.001).

About one quarter of the students (101 out of 383) reported a moderate to severe financial tensions during the pandemic. Only two (out of 12) students with severe suicidal thoughts reported low financial difficulties. Although the association between depressive thoughts and financial difficulties is significant, the distribution of depressive thoughts includes all categories of financial difficulties (even those who had reported no financial difficulties).

Moderate and severe changes in the living environment and eating patterns were reported by 36% and 28% of the respondents, respectively. Of those 55 students with moderate to severe suicidal thoughts, 38 reported moderate and severe change in the eating pattern, as well.

More than 40% (160 out of 383) of the respondents have been suffering from the feeling of social isolation, from moderate to severe levels. This parameter shows a significant association with both suicidal and depressive thoughts (P<0.001).

Those who reported moderate and severe change in sleeping habits are 126 (33%) of the students. More than one third of the students in these two categories (36%) are those students with moderate and severe suicidal thoughts, and this is almost 84% of those with moderate and severe suicidal thoughts (46 out of 55). The same scenario can be observed, regarding the difficulty in concentration. Where 144 (38%) respondents reported moderate and severe difficulties in concentrating, 41 (75%) of those with moderate and severe suicidal thoughts are present in the same categories. Exactly the same fraction (75%) of those with moderate and severe suicidal thoughts are those with moderate and severe concerns about their own health or the health of the loved ones during the pandemic (41 out of 55) (P<0.001).


The PSS-10 questionnaire has been widely used by researchers in the past three decades. Many published studies are available from different countries, shortly before the COVID-19 pandemic starts in late 2019. For example, a study from Saudi Arabia reported the mean PSS-10 score of 28.3 ± 3.7 for medical students in 2018 [10]. A study from United Kingdom [11] reported the PSS-10 mean score of 19.79 (SD=6.37) for social science university students in 2017. There are multiple studies from Malaysia, using SPP-10 instrument to evaluate the level of stress in Malaysian university students. The reported mean score has been 19.51 (SD=5.92) [12] in medical students, 18.9 [13] again in medical students, 30.3 (± 4.6) [14] in pharmacy students, and 27.5 (SD 4.763) [15] in undergraduate students. It is evident, based on frequent surveys from United Kingdom [16], India [17], China [18], Taiwan [19] and elsewhere, that the COVID-19 pandemic has aggravated the mental health situation among the students, worldwide. Obtaining the overall PSS-10 score of 17.99 in current study, as well as 18.8 in a study from the USA [8], would question the responsiveness of PSS-10 instrument, when the scores are compared with the reported ones, shortly before the pandemic. Previously, the construct validity of PSS-10 was questioned by other researchers [20]. It seems that COVID-19 pandemic provides an opportunity to relook at not only PSS-10, but also some other instruments that are used conventionally for evaluating the mental disorder severity.

Referred to the findings of the 11-construct questionnaire, almost 14% of the respondents had moderate to severe suicidal thoughts. Therefore, an educator who is handling a class of 50 students should assume that seven students could be suffering from difficulty in concentration, severe depressive thoughts, and suicide tendency. The association between the suicidal thoughts and other typical symptoms of depression, such as sleep disorders, alteration in eating habits, difficulty in concentration is well documented [21,22]. A meta-analysis with a student population size of 634,662 students from the North America, Asia, Europe and Africa reported a 12-month prevalence of 10.6% suicidal thoughts (95% CI 9.1%–12.3%), before the COVID-19 pandemic [23]. This is significantly lower than the estimated prevalence of suicidal thoughts among the Malaysian students during the pandemic.

A tight relationship was found between social isolation and feeling loneliness, on one hand and suicidal thoughts on the other hand. The interesting point was the independence of the feeling of isolation and loneliness from financial difficulties. Although the socioeconomic inequalities have been worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic [24], the current study shows that the feeling of isolation and loneliness affects everyone, regardless of the student’s financial situation.

Besides the suicidal thoughts, all other 10 variables of the questionnaire demonstrated at least 20% of respondents falling in the severe and moderate categories. This remarkable fraction of the college and university students needs a special attention of the educators and institutional managers during the pandemic. Those students should be identified actively, and a proper counselling program and orientation courses [25,26] must be implemented, based on the individual needs of each student. A closer relationship between the institution and parents [27] may result in a better outcome, with a more effective monitoring and a multidimensional consultation package, under the supervision of a therapist, where needed.


As conclusion, over 20% of students reported moderate to severe indicators of stress, anxiety, and depression. About 14% of the respondents fall in moderate to severe suicidal ideation groups. Loneliness and feeling social isolation are the most prevalent problems, as reported by the students. The educators and institution managers must seek for appropriate methods to address the critical condition.

Limitations and Future Work

The COVID-19 pandemic is a specific condition that probably creates a very special pattern of anxiety, stress, and depression, different from general features of those mental disorders. A qualitative survey could help reveal the features, dimensions, and severity of the disorders. In-depth investigation of the problems, especially among those students with suicidal thoughts would be a necessary step.

The sample size of current study did not allow the authors to evaluate the contribution of academic major or institution in the outcomes’ magnitude, due to the large number the participants’ majors and institutions. This could reduce the power of analysis where the number of students in each group was very low.


scan code
Get the App