ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry
Reach Us ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry +44 1752 712024
SOCIETIES:
mental health, psychiatry and mental health, journals on mental health, mental health journals, journals mental health
journals for mental health, best journals for mental health, mental health journals uk, journals on psychiatry
JOURNAL COVER:
journals of psychiatry, psychiatry journals, asean, journal
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 5373

ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry received 5373 citations as per google scholar report

ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry peer review process verified at publons
IMPACT FACTOR:
Journal Name ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry (MyCite Report)  
Total Publications 456
Total Citations 5688
Total Non-self Citations 12
Yearly Impact Factor 0.93
5-Year Impact Factor 1.44
Immediacy Index 0.1
Cited Half-life 2.7
H-index 30
Quartile
Social Sciences Medical & Health Sciences
Q3 Q2
KEYWORDS:
  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Behavioural Science
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Community Psychiatry
  • Dementia
  • Community Psychiatry
  • Suicidal Behavior
  • Social Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry Diseases
  • Psycho Trauma
  • Posttraumatic Stress
  • Psychiatric Symptoms
  • Psychiatric Treatment
  • Neurocognative Disorders (NCDs)
  • Depression
  • Mental Illness
  • Neurological disorder
  • Neurology
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Parkinson's disease

Abstract

Comparing employer-based and employee-based Psychosocial Risk Assessment Approaches contributing to Workplace Stress and Occupational Mental Illnesses in Industrial Settings: A Systematic Review

Author(s): Mbaye Fatimata Binetou Rassoule*, Cisse Goumbo, Befene Catherine Noélie, Cisse Maimouna Fafa, Thiam Khady, Dia Kane Yacine and Toure Nafissatou Oumar

Background: Occupational mental illnesses, including anxiety, depression, PTSD, and workplace stress, present serious challenges in industrial settings, making the identification of psychosocial risk factors critical for prevention and intervention. Employer-based and employee-based assessments are key tools for evaluating these risks, but their relative strengths and weaknesses remain inadequately explored.

Methods: A Systematic Review (SR) of database used: Scopus, Web of science, Cochrane library and PubMed was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) technique. Keywords “psychosocial risk assessment”, “workplace”, “mental health risk assessment”, “employer evaluation”, and “psychometric evaluation” were used in this research. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Studies in industries involving psychosocial risk assessment, (2) English language, and (3) Research published in peer-reviewed journals within ten years (2014 to 2024). The EPHPP-Quality Assessment Tool was used to assess the quality of the studies.

Results: All 9 studies utilised employee-based assessments, highlighting gaps in capturing organisational-level stressors. Key psychosocial risks consistently identified included workload, low job control, role ambiguity, and inadequate support, which were strongly linked to adverse mental health outcomes. However, the lack of employerbased assessments limited the identification of systemic factors such as workload distribution and organisational policies.

Conclusion: The findings emphasise the need for a hybrid assessment model integrating employer and employeebased data. Such a model could provide a more comprehensive understanding of workplace risks and support the development of effective strategies to mitigate occupational mental illnesses, enhance employee well-being, and improve overall organisational performance.


PDF

scan code
INDEXATION OF THE JOURNAL
Get the App

ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry ISSN: 2231-7805 (In Print)E-ISSN 2231-7791 Copyright 2026